Monologue Miseranted.

Probably many at a certain moment in life evaluated, analyzed the past, made conclusions and, possibly, shared them with others. Once he said something wrong, did or did not, in general, forced himself to rethink the past. Today I want to share with you the considerations that somehow accidentally formed, absolutely, just fell off the sky and I accepted them. A couple of weeks ago, sitting in the 6th lesson (oh yes, I forgot a little mentioning that your humble servant is a schoolboy 11 LVL) and, as always, trying to come into Nirvana and cut off right in the middle of the lesson, without wanting it, nevertheless delved into the topic of the lesson. The lesson was the Russian language, and on the agenda there was a analysis of the next egash composition of some criticism there, I do not remember. The question posed by the author of this text was: “What does honor mean for a modern person?”. Not the point. The main thing that the inner voice asked me at that moment was: “What is moral?”. And in fact, it will be discussed.

I heard this pathos phrase many times: “Who gave you the right to take someone else’s life?”. Probably also heard? So, and who gave him the right to this life? What kind of creature is this in general, which is scattered by rights, thereby, apparently, towering itself over others? God? Devil? There may be a constitution? Yes, maybe. This is written on paper that the ax, as you know, cannot be carved. Or you can? Why are we, citizens of democratic states, allow us to limit our freedom by laws, rights and other similar ones? To protect yourself? From what? From the same people like me? Are you really not able to stand up for yourself? The same is incapable? Then you will find yourself defeated, and the punishment for your defeat is death. “The strongest survives” is the same template phrase, often found in books and films. And it really is. Our whole life is a continuous struggle for survival. In ancient times, she was without rules and survived the most adapted and strongest individuals. Now it is like karate, fencing is a game with the rules prohibiting the enemy to finish. But he is a burden. He interferes, he is obstacles on the way to your goal. Why do we intentionally impose on ourselves the moral that will interfere with us and give a second chance to our opponent? Again, relatives. You know, there is such a river trout that, after the caviar was marked, floats into the sea to die, because it fulfilled its purpose. Now it will sound blasphemous, but why, when you grew up and took place in life, your relatives, or rather your mother and father do not die? They are for you exactly the same burden. They fulfilled their parental duty, right? And also you, who have already become fathers and mothers and grew up your child, why you do not go into another world? In fact, this is an ideal model of mankind, when only the strongest and ideal people breed and live in the world, or maybe supernomers. What holds us? Morality. “You can’t, it’s bad, not human”. Only that. At the same time, they did not try to unify it so that it is one for everyone – it remains for everyone its own, ideal and unique only for itself. You can’t beat a person that killing another person is bad. He must understand and realize it himself or not to understand and not realize. Everyone determines for himself what is bad and what is good. And already from this a common “shield” is formed – morality. Be that as it may, a person should not give a reason to limit himself. He is. And he does only what he considers correct. And everything else: religion, the state, some authority, only the unification form of morality for those who have not yet developed it for themselves, or could not and in herd feeling weaves with the like on the occasion. The rest, in my opinion, are really free. Freely spiritually first of all for themselves. Maybe when everyone becomes free, perfect humanity will come?

The best comments

Perhaps the same morality (and more specifically, then our minds), which you are here intensely, is that it helps us to grow and develop as a form.

Trout does not have self -awareness, that’s what the chip is.
In addition, people are able to give offspring several times, so there is no biological disposition to death after raising the first generation of children.

In general, think more, it’s useful.

Enough for our century, and then at least https://nonukcasinosites.co.uk/cayman-islands-casinos/ a flood. The lack of moral standards also implies a lack of anxiety about what will become of humanity in the future.

“In fact, this is the ideal model of mankind, when only the strongest and ideal people, or maybe supernomers, grow and live in the world”. Survive, as long ago, not the strongest, but those who have adapted better. Evolution in action. Humanity has not just become a dominant look, although we are strongly inferior to any other mammal: we are weaker than the defense mechanisms, we have lousy vision and smell, frozen in winter, and so on, you can list it to infinity.
So think about the same morality (and more specifically, then our minds), which you are here intensely, is what helps us grow and develop as a form.
Humanity is 40 thousand years old, but only with the advent of those very norms of morality, an intelligent religion, we committed not so much quantitative as a qualitative leap. Over the past two or three thousand years, people have reached hundreds of times more than in the previous 30 with a tail.
Another thing is that in the modern world the average person no longer needs these “crutches”, it is actually laid down in us that it is good to transfer your grandmother across the road, but to break your head with a brick with a drunken neighbor, because he called you the son of a dog is bad.
Hunting you to return 40 thousand years ago, discarding everything that we came to? I don’t.

And everything else: religion, the state, some authority, only the unification form of morality for those who have not yet developed it for themselves, or could not and in herd feeling weaves with the like on the occasion. The rest, in my opinion, are really free. Freely spiritually first of all for themselves. Maybe when everyone becomes free, perfect humanity will come?

You have now come to the conclusion that anarchy is the best and only true socio-political system. Why so? Because it has no place for society and, most importantly, politics. There is only a person, self -sufficient and developed, and developed to such an extent that without any instructions there knows from above what he needs and strives for this.
There is no place in it to norms, morality or some kind of truth for all. Dig the rest yourself)
PS: And yes, there is no government in anarchy just because it is not necessary. No one is going to protect the weak, and no one needs to offend them, because they do not bother anyone.

In principle, the topic is viable – a third -party view of the structure of society is characteristic of any living mind. But we’ll figure it out better.
“The strongest survive”. The weakest man of large mammals – all types equal to us in size/mass are superior to a person by force/speed/night vision/fur and other properties of their bodies. So the person has acquired numerical dominance thanks to the intellect, first of all. Compensating for physical weakness, a person was able to coordinate the actions of individuals in the pack – some hunt, others monitor offspring, others share their experience. This leads to one of your thoughts – the function of the parents. If there is no connection between generations, then the degradation of society will come for one simple reason – each generation will make the same mistakes, butt with the rake that they themselves left on the road. Only generation of generations can maintain development. Neither the “Holy Scripture” nor the other written arches of laws will have any weight already through the generation. There will be no one to clarify the meaning of the norms of behavior in the case of a double interpretation, which is found completely. This is the principle of continuity of generations. The only thing that needs to be learned is that you can not stomp in the spot, you need to move (re -read the “fathers and children” of Turgenev).
However, moral issues are the only thing that distinguishes us from animals. Initially, morality was transmitted through religious dogmas. However, then the doctrines are overgrown with tons of left slag, such as a ban on eating pork, a taboo to work on a Saturday day and worshiping the remains of the dead (the list can continue for an arbitrarily long time). Vera by intimidation inspired following the norms of morality (everything would be so definitely. ), saving from rolling into a common massacre and chaos. Since if all conflicts were resolved by force, the level of intelligence would fall at a striking speed. I will quote Tolkien: “Many of the living deserve death, and many of the dead are life. You can return it to them? That’s the same. Then do not rush to condemn and death. Nobody, even the wisest of the wise, is given to see all the intricacies of fate.”So the physical elimination of the enemy is the most stupid way. If there is a worthy opponent, a person is forced to develop, look for ways to become better than an adversary. But not to shy away the drin in the crotch or in the head. That is why we limit ourselves to laws, rules of behavior and other frames. Not to protect yourself from everyone – to protect yourself from ourselves, our most powerful opponents.
In conclusion, I will say – after 12 days I will be 23 years old. I am an absolute atheist, but I am convinced of the need for moral norms and rules. Without them, we gnaw at each other’s throats less than in a hundred years. Overcoming difficulties, we develop. As one smart Salarian said: “Difficulty. Call. No obstacles -no development. No development – the culture is rotting “.

I had in mind fascism, Nazism, it is more specialized. But the essence of what – there are stronger individuals, but there are weak. Weak slaves of strong, weak garbage, they must be crushed. Here is the essence of fascism. In Nazism, they ordered that the Aryans are more powerful of the races, so it went … The funny thing is that the Slavs are also Arians, and they wanted to destroy them as animals.
It is actually impossible to determine who is stronger and who is weaker. I wrote about this in one of my last blogs. Darwinism of one -sidedly interprets, not the strongest, but the adaptive. One individual cannot survive, the team always survives.
Karoche on the blog about anarchy, I will melt all points. I’ll make it soon.

Yes there is clearly not Nazism. If I was not mistaken in the half of life, then Nazism is when the preference at the official, legislative, level is given to representatives of the indigenous nation, and it is not necessary that all the rest be destroyed. They can live nearby, but they have less rights.

Well, I don’t call for this. And discard everything that has already been achieved is stupid. Moreover, I ask a question and try to answer it myself. What are the complaints about morality? Yes, no.

Perhaps the same morality (and more specifically, then our minds), which you are here intensely, is that it helps us to grow and develop as a form.

As for evolution: this is, in my view, the speed of our development grew with geometric progression, from which over the past centuries, people have reached much more than in more ancient times.

Well, it was not completely seriously on my part. I just hinted to you that this has a place to be, because with democracy you can’t achieve the right one, in the mass order. Although, probably, the whole charm of non -standard thinking and models of behavior is just that they are non -standard.

The person is therefore called reasonable (what I doubt more and more) that I am able to predict future events and influence the habitat, preserving the population. And the philosophy “after at least a flood” is absolutely non -viable, because it is at a standstill with the subsequent degeneration of the species.